Indicator: Water infrastructure| Indicator description | Complete list of Indicators | What the results tell us for TumutTumut Shire Council has no formal data on the age or life expectancy of the water supply or the sewerage systems, but has determined that both are in satisfactory condition. The Council has in place a routine maintenance program for the reticulated water supply system and plans to install chemical dosing to reduce phosphorus levels and upgrades for sludge handling and mixing facilities. The condition of the stormwater system is poor and Council does not know the remaining life expectancy of the system. The Council has not yet identified what upgrades of this system will be required in the short to medium term. There is no greywater recycling system in the Shire. Just under 40% of the Shire is sewered. (Of an estimated total number of 10 006 properties within the Shire, 3679 were connected to the sewerage system at the end of the reporting period). The number of properties connected to the stormwater system was unknown.
N/A - Not Available About the data
Description: What does 'water infrastructure' measure?Which data are collected?
Why do we report this indicator?Our need for safe drinking water has lead most towns and cities to build treatment works, pipes and reservoirs (called infrastructure) to treat and distribute water. Many settlements also have some infrastructure to remove waste water and storm water for safe treatment and disposal. The condition and life-expectancy of all this water infrastructure is an indicator of the extent to which the community has been prepared to invest in its own quality of life. It also indicates how prepare the community is to actively reduce the adverse impacts of human settlement on the natural environment, particularly streams. The types of water infrastructure that should be addressed include:
Grey water and other recycling systems should also be included. The status of this indicator reflects the investment made in water infrastructure in past years. Ongoing investment would be expected to reduce current maintenance costs, and that increases the range of options for implementing more sustainable systems. It can also allow us to maintain or even improve the quality of reticulated water flowing into and out of human settlements. Where the condition of infrastructure has declined as a result of minimal maintenance over its lifetime, costs of repair, replacement and upgrading to more environmentally friendly systems could be prohibitive. |